How do I record the supply of passport data in my purchasing contract?
Document who supplies which passport data, in what form and when
The supply of passport data in a purchase contract is documented by describing which party supplies which data, in what format, at what point in the chain and what happens if data is missing, incorrect or changes. For clothing and textiles, this passport is compiled from information from the manufacturer or importer: fibre composition, origin, materials used, and the data needed to meet the requirements of the future digital product passport. A purchase contract is the place where it is agreed who is responsible for that supply, so that this does not only come to light at the time of first delivery.
For whom this is relevant, and for whom it is not
This agreement is particularly relevant for parties who purchase textiles or clothing from a manufacturer, agent or intermediary and who themselves act as a brand, importer or responsible market participant. The ESPR imposes obligations on actors in the supply chain (Article 38) and specifically on importers (Article 29), and those obligations do not automatically arise with the manufacturer if the data is not contractually regulated. For a purely domestic resale between two parties neither of whom acts as a manufacturer, importer or authorised representative, it is different — the question there is rather who in the chain ultimately fulfils that role. This page is about the contractual side: how you document who supplies the data, not about who according to the ESPR is responsible for the passport itself. That latter question flows from the role a party plays in the supply chain, not from what is in the contract.
No fixed start date yet, but a work plan
There is no set date yet for when the digital product passport for textiles becomes mandatory. According to the ESPR work plan 2025-2030, a delegated act for textiles is expected in 2027, with clothing consisting of eighty percent or more textile fibres as the first category. That is a plan, not a commitment, and the actual date is only fixed once that delegated act is published. Until then, the general provisions of the ESPR on the role of actors in the supply chain and importers already apply as a framework, but the specific product requirements for textiles — and thus exactly which data a passport must contain — only follow from that act. Anyone adjusting a purchase contract now does so on the basis of the expected direction, not on the basis of a definitive obligation.
How this is built in practice
A first step is to identify the data that the other party supplies: fibre composition, country of production, materials used and any other information relevant to the passport. This is followed by the form: is this data supplied as a separate document, in a shared system, or directly linked to the data needed for the QR data carrier. Next, the timing of supply is important — before production, on delivery of the goods, or with every change in the assortment — so that the passport does not have to be reconstructed afterwards. Another point is what happens if there is a change: if a manufacturer switches yarn supplier or adjusts the composition, it is practical if the contract already describes that this is reported and which data is then supplied again. Finally, it is customary to document what happens if data is missing or proves to be incorrect: who corrects it, and under what terms that happens. These are contractual agreements between purchaser and supplier; they do not change the legal obligations that follow from the ESPR itself, but they ensure that the party responsible under the ESPR actually has access to the correct data.
Where this comes from: Article 38 and 29 of the ESPR
Article 38 of the ESPR describes that actors in the supply chain have obligations regarding the provision of information necessary for compliance with product requirements, including the digital product passport. Article 29 describes the obligations of importers, which include ensuring that a product is accompanied by the required information before it is placed on the market. Both articles address the relationship between market participants and the requirements of the regulation; they do not prescribe a specific contract form. The manner in which the provision of data between buyer and supplier is regulated is up to the contracting parties themselves, as long as the party responsible under the ESPR ultimately has the correct data at its disposal.
If you are already in discussion with suppliers about future contracts, you can consult the full text of Article 38 and Article 29 of the ESPR via the links below this article, and continue to follow texpas.eu when the delegated act for textiles is published — that publication will determine when data provision for the passport becomes concrete.
What this is based on
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 38 (requirements for actors in the supply chain)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 29 (obligations of importers)
The regulation itself is available on EUR-Lex. We provide references for each statement; you do not need to take our word for it.
What you must do concretely
What is expected of you
The ESPR imposes obligations on actors in the supply chain (Article 38) and on importers (Article 29). For a brand or importer that has clothing manufactured by a manufacturer outside the EU, this means in practice that the data for the digital product passport must come from somewhere — and that source must be properly arranged.
Obtaining manufacturer data
An importer placing clothing on the EU market is responsible under Article 29 of the ESPR for the conformity of the product, even if the data has actually been drawn up by a manufacturer elsewhere. For a company with 10 to 100 employees, this means that requesting data cannot be optional: there must be a fixed procedure to obtain the correct data per collection or per order. Which data precisely is described in the overview of which data you request from your clothing and textile supplier.
Passing data on to the next actors in the chain
Article 38 addresses actors in the supply chain in the broad sense: not only the manufacturer, but also intermediaries that process, package or resell the product. For a company that itself also supplies other parties — for example a wholesaler that supplies retailers — this means that the data received must also be able to be passed on correctly. This requires an internal agreement on who manages the data and keeps it up to date.
Being able to substantiate the accuracy of the data
The obligations in both articles presuppose that the data supplied are correct. For an importer who is not themselves involved in production, this means that something must be organised to verify or substantiate the supplied data, for example with certificates. How this works in practice is described under verifying the data from your supplier for accuracy.
Establishing who is responsible for what
Both Article 29 and Article 38 are based on a chain of responsibilities. For a company of this size, this means that the contractual agreements with suppliers must be a direct translation of this legal division: what the manufacturer supplies, what the importer adds themselves, and what happens if either of them does not.
Where things go wrong in practice
A number of situations come up repeatedly in practice in purchasing contracts that are not tailored to these obligations.
A purchasing contract often covers price, delivery time and product quality, but says nothing about the data needed for the digital product passport. If that data does not arrive or arrives too late, there is no contractual basis to do anything about it. What to do if a supplier does not provide the data is described under what you can do if your supplier does not provide the data.
A second situation: the garment is not made by a single manufacturer, but by multiple parties — for example weaving at one factory, manufacturing at another. The contract with the main supplier then often tacitly assumes that this party can provide all data, when in fact it cannot. Who provides which part of the data in such a situation is explained under the question of who provides which data if a garment is manufactured at multiple factories.
A third situation arises around certificates. A supplier sends a GOTS or OEKO-TEX certificate, but the contract says nothing about how that certificate relates to the data in the passport, or what happens if the certificate expires. How a certificate can be linked as evidence to the passport is described under the use of a GOTS or OEKO-TEX certificate as evidence in the digital product passport.
A fourth situation: the country of manufacture is not separately named in the contract, whilst this is data that may have to be included in the product passport. If the supplier or factory changes without notification, current data will be missing without anyone noticing.
A fifth situation arises with imports from outside the EU: the contract regulates the trading terms, but not who is responsible for providing product passport data at the moment of import. What the product passport means for imports from outside the EU is explained in what the product passport means for imports of clothing and textiles from outside the European Union.
What you can record
In a purchase contract with a manufacturer or intermediary, a number of matters can be included that support the supply of product passport data:
- A data schedule setting out exactly which data the supplier provides, in which format and at which point in the production process — aligned with the overview of data requested from a supplier.
- A delivery date for data, separate from the delivery date of the goods, so that data is not requested only upon arrival of the shipment.
- A provision on updates, in case a supplier, subcontractor, facility or raw material changes.
- A reference to certificates that serve as substantiation, including their period of validity and what happens when certificates expire.
- An agreement on liability for incorrect or missing data, in line with the allocation of responsibilities in Article 29 and Article 38.
- A provision on verification, such as the right to have documentation verified or to conduct an audit at the supplier; see also the explanation on having a supplier audited abroad for the product passport.
For companies that do not yet know whether these obligations apply to their products, it is advisable first to check whether the digital product passport applies to their own clothing and textiles, before tightening contractual arrangements.
This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the regulations that this platform covers. We are not familiar with your situation. If you are in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.
Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something wrong? Let us know — corrections are given priority.