texpas.eu

What does the ESPR change for the clothing and textile industry?

ESPR brings ecological requirements and a digital product passport for clothing

The ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) is the framework regulation enabling the EU to impose ecological design requirements on almost all product groups — think of sustainability, repairability, recyclability and the use of recycled material. For clothing and textiles, the main consequence is a mandatory digital product passport: a QR code on the garment linking to data on material composition, origin, care and end-of-life. Where a brand currently decides what appears on a label, that information will partly become mandatory and equally accessible to everyone — consumer, enforcement authority, recycler.

The ESPR itself sets no concrete requirements per product. It is a framework: the actual requirements for clothing and textiles come via separate delegated acts, product group by product group. Until such an act exists, nothing changes in practice for the obligations of an individual garment.

Scope: who it applies to and what it covers

The regulation applies to products placed on the EU market, regardless of where they are produced. For the textile industry, this means clothing brands, importers and private label operators placing clothing on the EU market are in scope — not only manufacturers within the EU.

Not everything falls under it. Article 1 of the ESPR explicitly excludes a number of product categories from its scope, such as food, animal feed, medicines and living organisms, and for some products other specific rules already apply and take precedence. For clothing and textiles, moreover, requirements will not apply to the entire industry at once: the Commission is working out product group by product group which requirements apply when. For textiles, the first group in line is clothing consisting of eighty percent or more textile fibres. Other textile products and clothing with a lower textile fibre content will follow at a later date, or only if a separate delegated act is adopted for them.

The date is not yet fixed

There is no fixed entry date for the digital product passport for clothing. The ESPR makes the introduction of requirements per product group dependent on a delegated act that the Commission adopts and publishes separately. The Commission's work plan for 2025-2030 states that such a delegated act for textiles is expected in 2027, with clothing consisting of eighty percent or more textile fibres as the first category. A work plan is a schedule, not a binding decision — the actual date of entry into force only follows from the published act itself and may differ from it.

Until that act is published, existing rules on labelling and product information apply to clothing and textiles, without an obligation for a digital product passport. Once the delegated act for textiles is published, with a concrete date, this will be stated here.

What this means for a clothing brand

The first step is to check whether a collection or product line falls under the category that is first in line: clothing with a textile fibre content of eighty percent or more. This can already be determined on the basis of material composition, even though the obligation is not yet active.

The second step is an inventory of the data that would eventually appear in a passport: material composition, origin of raw materials and production, chemicals used, and information on care and recyclability. Those who already maintain this data in a structured way — for example through suppliers or certifications — will have an advantage when the delegated act is published.

The third step is to monitor the publication of that delegated act itself. It will contain not only the implementation date, but also precisely which data fields become mandatory and how the QR data carrier must function technically. Only then can it be specified what a product passport must concretely contain.

The fourth step, for those who prefer not to wait until the last moment, is to start thinking now about the infrastructure: where the data comes from, who supplies it, and how a QR code ends up on the product. A passport must not only be compiled after the requirements are published, but also remain accessible for a long time.

Where this is stated: Article 1 ESPR

The scope and objective of the regulation are set out in Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1781. It is established there that the regulation provides a framework for ecodesign requirements which are then filled in per product category via delegated acts, and which products are excluded from that framework. The European Commission provides an overview on its ecodesign regulation page of how this process proceeds per product category, including the role of the work plan in which textiles are named as one of the first categories.

What to do

Those who currently place clothing or textiles on the EU market would be best advised to start by mapping the material composition of the collection and checking whether it falls under the category of clothing with eighty percent or more textile fibres. In addition, it is worthwhile to systematically collect data on origin and material that already exists within the organisation or with suppliers, so that when the delegated act is published, you do not have to start from scratch.

What this is based on

The regulation itself is available on EUR-Lex. We provide references for each statement; you do not need to take our word for it.

What you must do concretely

What is expected of you

The ESPR is a framework regulation: it does not itself lay down concrete requirements for clothing and textiles, but gives the European Commission the power to develop those requirements per product group. Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 describes the scope broadly: almost all physical products placed on the EU market can fall under a delegated act. For the clothing and textile industry, this means in particular: a framework has been established, and the real obligations will come later, product by product. What is currently expected of a company is primarily to follow that process and to get the information in order that will be needed later.

Find out whether your products fall within the regulation

The ESPR does not automatically affect all textile products. For each product group, it is determined which requirements will apply, and not every garment or household textile is affected in the same way or at the same time. For a company with 10 to 100 employees, this means there is a first step in finding out which of its own product groups are mentioned. This is not a legal exercise in itself, but a practical inventory: which collections, materials and product categories does the company carry, and do these correspond to what is described in the upcoming regulations. An overview of which products from the clothing and textile sector fall under the ESPR provides an initial reference point, as does the question of whether the digital product passport applies to the company's own clothing and textiles.

Follow the delegated act for your own product group

Because the concrete requirements only arise once the Commission publishes a delegated act, monitoring that process has become a recurring task. For a mid-sized company, this means that someone — often in the role of compliance, procurement or sustainability — must monitor the Commission's announcements, rather than waiting for a sectoral announcement. What a delegated act is exactly and why it determines what a company must do is described on the page on delegated acts. For most companies, this is a matter of periodic checking, not a daily task, but a task that cannot be left to chance.

Assess whether your own product category counts as clothing or not

Within the textile industry, clothing, accessories, shoes, household textiles and workwear often overlap in administration, whereas the regulations do not necessarily treat them equally. A company that sells both clothing and bags or belts would be well advised to check whether the digital product passport also applies to those accessories and shoes will apply to, and whether that happens at a different time than for the clothing line. The same applies to companies that supply workwear or uniforms: the question of whether a digital product passport also needs to be made for workwear and occupational clothing is a different question than that for consumer clothing. Those who supply fabrics for interiors, curtains, bed linens or other household textiles, would do well to keep this separate from the clothing collection in their own administration.

Make a distinction between the ESPR and the broader textile strategy

For companies already engaged in sustainability, confusion sometimes arises between the ESPR, which regulates the digital product passport, and the European textile strategy, which more broadly addresses waste and producer responsibility, among other things. The difference between the two is relevant because the obligations do not have the same source, timing or scope. Those who want to compare the two will find an explanation on the page about the distinction between the ESPR and the European textile strategy, and on the question of whether extended producer responsibility has anything to do with the digital product passport.

Where things go wrong in practice

A number of situations come up again with companies preparing for the ESPR:

  • Assume it is not yet relevant because the date is not yet fixed. The delegated act does not yet exist, but the preparation time — gathering supplier data, setting up systems — takes more time than is often thought if you only start when it is published.
  • Only look at the main collection. A brand focuses on the clothing line and overlooks that accessories, footwear or a workwear line may fall under a separate assessment.
  • Thinking that small business size automatically means exemption. Whether and how a company's size plays a role is a question that must be answered separately and should not be assumed.
  • Leaving samples and showroom models out of consideration or including them without substantiation. Some companies are uncertain whether test collections and showroom pieces that are not sold fall under the same rules as the regular collection.
  • Treating the textile strategy and the ESPR as one and the same obligation, thereby applying obligations from one process to the other, or conversely ignoring them.

For the question about business size there is more detailed guidance on whether the product passport also applies to small companies, and for the question about test collections on the page on samples and showroom models that are not sold.

What you can record

  • An overview of all product groups that the company offers, with a note for each group indicating whether it may fall under a delegated act.
  • A fixed moment (for example quarterly) at which the status of the delegated act for the company's own product group is checked with the Commission.
  • An internal responsible person who monitors the progress of the regulation and reports on it.
  • A distinction in the records between clothing, accessories, workwear and household textiles, so that each category can be assessed separately regarding when and how requirements apply.
  • A note on business size and any relevance thereof, including the source on which that conclusion is based.
  • An overview of which suppliers and manufacturers can already provide data that could eventually be included in a product passport, even if this is not yet mandatory.

This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the regulations that this platform covers. We are not familiar with your situation. If you are in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.

Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something wrong? Let us know — corrections are given priority.