What obligations does a distributor or trader of clothing and textiles have?
Verification is central, not compilation yourself
A distributor or trader of clothing and textiles does not compile a digital product passport itself, but verifies that the passport exists before the clothing item is offered or sold. This verification is the core of the obligations under Articles 30 and 31 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781). Whereas the manufacturer or importer is responsible for the content of the passport, the distributor and trader have the task of checking whether the product is provided with the required marking, labelling and data carrier, and to refrain from proceeding if that is not the case. In addition, there are rules on how the product is stored and transported, and on what happens if, after sale, it turns out that a product does not meet the requirements.
Who this applies to, and who it does not
These obligations apply to any party in the supply chain that places clothing or textile products on the market without being a manufacturer, authorised representative or importer themselves: wholesalers, retail chains, web shops and other sales outlets. It concerns products that fall within the ecodesign work plan; by the time that becomes relevant for textiles, it is expected to be clothing with a high proportion of textile fibres. It does not apply to the party that draws up the passport in terms of content — that remains the manufacturer, its authorised representative or the importer. A distributor or trader therefore does not need to collect data themselves on materials, origin or repair possibilities; that obligation lies upstream. What does lie with the distributor and trader is the visibility of the passport towards the next link in the chain or the end consumer, for example by keeping the QR code on the product intact and readable and not removing or covering it when repacking or labelling.
No fixed entry date yet
There is no fixed date yet for these obligations to apply to clothing and textiles. The ESPR itself is in force, but which product groups are covered and when is determined by delegated act. For textiles, that act is foreseen in 2027 according to the European Commission's work plan for 2025-2030, with clothing that is eighty per cent or more textile fibres as the first category. Until that act is published and in force, the obligations under Articles 30 and 31 do not yet apply to clothing and textiles. As soon as a definitive date is known, it will be stated here.
Four steps for practice
Whoever as a distributor or trader has to deal with this subject, best tackles it in this order. First: check with the supplier or manufacturer whether the digital product passport is present and whether the QR data carrier is on the product or packaging, before the product is offered to the next link in the chain or to the consumer. Next: verify that the identification details of the manufacturer or importer are on the product or accompanying documentation, so that in case of queries it is clear who is responsible for the content. Then: in case of doubt or if a product does not appear to be compliant — for example a missing or damaged data carrier — do not proceed with selling or supplying the product until this is clarified, and inform the manufacturer or importer about this. Finally: when requested by a supervisory authority, be able to provide the available documentation and contact details of the manufacturer or importer, and cooperate with any follow-up steps that the authority itself determines. For your own business operations, it is practical to make this verification a fixed part of your procurement or receipt process, so that it does not only come to light during a spot check or complaint.
Where this is stated: Article 30 and 31 of the ESPR
These obligations arise from Article 30 and Article 31 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1781, which establish the role of distributors and traders within the supply chain of economic operators. These articles describe what is expected of a distributor or trader when placing a product on the market, including due diligence regarding marking, documentation and not reselling products that may reasonably be assumed not to comply with the requirements. The exact practical implementation for clothing and textiles — which data precisely must be visible and in what manner — follows from the delegated act that is still to be published.
What to do now
If you currently distribute or sell clothing or textiles, it is best to ask your own suppliers now about their planning regarding the digital product passport, so that integration with the procurement process will not come as a surprise once the delegated act is in place. This page will be updated as soon as the date and precise requirements for clothing and textiles are known; until then, there is no legal obligation to act already, but there is room to prepare in advance.
What this is based on
The regulation itself is available on EUR-Lex. We provide references for each statement; you do not need to take our word for it.
What you must do concretely
What is expected of you
A distributor or trader is someone who offers clothing and textiles in the supply chain without being a manufacturer, importer or brand owner: think of a wholesaler, a retail chain that purchases from third parties, or an intermediary that resells goods without modifying them. The ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) imposes on these parties in Articles 30 and 31 a number of control and information obligations. This is not about compiling the product passport itself — that is the responsibility of the manufacturer or importer — but about what a distributor or trader checks and passes on before a product is placed on the market.
Check whether the product passport is present
Before a product is placed on the market, it should be checked whether a digital product passport is attached and whether the corresponding QR data carrier is on the product or packaging. For a company with 10 to 100 employees, this means in practice a control step upon receipt of goods: someone in the procurement or warehouse process scans the data carrier and checks whether the passport opens and displays the correct information. This is not a legal review of the content, but a presence check.
Verify that the legally required information is on the product
In addition to the passport itself, the question is whether the information required by the regulations is actually visible or accessible — think of what appears on the label versus what appears in the passport. For a medium-sized company, this means that quality control or procurement adds a fixed check alongside the existing checks on sizing, colour and quality of the batch.
Do not place on the market if passport or data carrier is lacking
If a product is not accompanied by the required passport or data carrier, the principle is that it is not placed on the market. This affects planning: a batch that is logistically ready for delivery but whose passport is not in order remains in practice blocked until it is. For companies operating on short delivery times, this can have a real effect on lead times.
Pass information to the next party in the chain
A distributor or trader who is aware of non-conformity — for example a missing or incorrect passport — is assumed not to let this pass silently to the next link. This requires an internal agreement about who signals this and to whom it is reported back: the company's own purchaser, the supplier, or both.
Cooperate with supervisory authorities
At the request of a supervisory authority, cooperation is expected in taking measures to remedy non-conformity, including providing relevant information and documentation. This means that a company must be able to trace from whom a batch was purchased and what documentation accompanied it — something that is often already part of an existing procurement file, but which must now also be in order from this perspective.
Where things go wrong in practice
A number of situations come up repeatedly in practice.
A wholesaler purchases from various suppliers within and outside the EU, and assumes without verification that "the passport will be included" because the supplier has promised this verbally. In a spot check, the data carrier is found to be missing or to refer to an empty or incorrect page.
A retail chain sets up control of the passport as a one-off action upon first delivery from a new supplier, but does not repeat this for subsequent deliveries from the same supplier — whereas changes in product composition can occur without the passport being updated.
A trader notices that a passport is not factually consistent with the label, but has no documented procedure for who internally reviews this and whether the batch is withheld or still delivered.
A company that itself acts as a wholesaler thinks that distributors' obligations are only relevant to the party selling directly to the consumer, and underestimates its own role in the supply chain. If you recognize yourself in this, read the precise demarcation here I am a clothing wholesaler, what are my obligations regarding the product passport.
Finally, confusion arises when a company both purchases from third parties and sells under its own brand: the role as distributor for one assortment and as brand owner for another assortment requires a different set of obligations, and that distinction is not always made in practice. For the latter, the explanation can be found at I sell clothing and textiles under my own brand — what obligations do I have?
What you can record
For a distributor or trader, it is practical to establish a number of matters structurally, not as a one-off action but as a recurring part of the procurement process:
- A fixed inspection step on goods receipt in which it is recorded whether the product passport and the QR data carrier are present, and by whom this inspection was carried out.
- An overview per supplier of who is responsible for the passport — the manufacturer, the importer, or the supplier itself as brand owner — so that if there is a deficiency, it is immediately clear who to contact. If there is doubt about this role distribution, who is responsible for the product passport of clothing and textiles? provides a starting point.
- An internal agreement on what happens if a consignment arrives without a valid passport: who decides on release, and how this is reported back to the supplier.
- Retention of correspondence and documentation regarding a detected discrepancy, so that it is available upon request from a supervisory authority.
- A file per supplier with basic data on the origin of the goods, so that traceability in the supply chain is demonstrable.
For companies that purchase goods from a manufacturer outside the EU, it is moreover important to be clear about who fulfils which role in that case, because responsibility for the passport does not automatically fall to the trader itself. This issue is addressed in my manufacturer is outside the EU — who arranges the product passport then? It is also advisable for those who sell via an online marketplace alongside their own physical trade to separately examine the obligations involved, as elaborated in what does the product passport mean if I sell clothing and textiles via an online marketplace?
This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the regulations that this platform covers. We are not familiar with your situation. If you are in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.
Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something wrong? Let us know — corrections are given priority.