When does the product passport become mandatory for clothing and textiles?
No fixed date yet, targeted for 2027 and 2029
There is currently no established date on which the digital product passport for clothing and textiles becomes mandatory. What is certain, however, is the route to get there: the European Commission is working according to a work programme for the period 2025-2030, in which textiles is mentioned as one of the first product groups. Within that work programme, a delegated act for textiles is expected in 2027, with clothing and textile products composed of eighty per cent or more textile fibres as the first category. Only when that act is in place will it be clear from when the obligation actually takes effect and for which products exactly. Based on the current timeline, texpas assumes that the actual obligation will begin around 2029, but this is an estimate based on the typical time between a delegated act and the moment when businesses must comply with it — not a date that is already formally established.
For whom this will apply later, and for whom it will not
The obligation being prepared here applies to clothing and textile products within the scope of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781). Within that group, textiles with a high proportion of textile fibres — eighty per cent or more — take priority: this is the category for which the first delegated act will be drawn up. Products with a different, more mixed composition, or other parts of the fashion and textile chain such as footwear or accessories, do not automatically fall under that same first round. They may come up at a later point in the work programme, via their own delegated act with their own requirements and their own date. Also important: this upcoming obligation concerns the digital product passport as regulated by the ESPR, not other existing obligations regarding textiles, such as labelling of fibre composition. These are separate from each other and each has its own basis.
What applies while the date is not yet set
Until the moment the delegated act for textiles is published, there is no legal obligation to maintain a digital product passport for clothing or textiles. So nothing is changing at the moment in what a brand, importer or private label is required to submit in this area. What does happen until then is that the Commission further develops the work programme and prepares the delegated act, which will set out the concrete requirements: which data must be in the passport, what the QR data carrier looks like, and from which date the obligation applies. Once that act is adopted and published, the date will be stated here. Until then, any date mentioned, including the 2029 estimate mentioned here, is an expectation and not a commitment.
The order in which to prepare for this
Anyone already dealing with this subject typically approaches it in a few steps. First, it is useful to determine whether your own assortment falls within the first category: clothing or textiles with a high proportion of textile fibres will be affected first, so the incentive to start early is greatest there. After that, it is a matter of following the publication of the delegated act, since that is what will ultimately determine which data is mandatory and from when. In advance of this, it is practical to get the basic data that will almost certainly appear in every passport in order: material composition, origin of raw materials, and information about manufacturer or supplier. Most companies already have this information somewhere, and bringing it together takes time that will not be available after the act is published. Once the date and the exact requirements are known, the step towards a working passport is considerably smaller.
The basis: Article 18 and Articles 4 and 8 of the ESPR
That the introduction of the digital product passport proceeds by product group follows from Article 18 of the ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781), which requires the Commission to set priorities and draw up a work programme for the order in which product groups are addressed. The power to establish the actual requirements for each product group rests with the Commission through delegated acts, as provided for in Article 4 of the ESPR. What such a delegated act must contain precisely — including the date of application and the specific requirements for the passport for that product group — is set out in Article 8 of the ESPR. Only with the publication of the delegated act for textiles will it thus become clear what exactly will apply and from when.
If you are already working with a collection that will be first in line, you do not need to wait for the delegated act to begin: collecting and organising material, origin and supplier data can start now, and texpas is monitoring the publication of the act so that the date on this page will be updated as soon as it becomes known.
What this is based on
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 18 (prioritisation and planning)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR), Article 4 (powers to adopt delegated acts) and Article 8 (content of delegated acts)
The regulation itself is available on EUR-Lex. We provide references for each statement; you do not need to take our word for it.
What you must do concretely
What is expected of you
The obligation to maintain a digital product passport for clothing and textiles does not yet exist. The ESPR (Regulation (EU) 2024/1781) is the framework regulation that creates the possibility, but the actual obligation for a product group arises only with a delegated act per product group, as described in Article 4 and Article 8 of the ESPR. For clothing and textiles, that act does not yet exist. What is therefore expected of you in the meantime is mainly: knowing what you are facing once that act comes, and not being caught off guard.
Knowing whether your products fall within the first round
Article 18 of the ESPR describes how the European Commission prioritises which product groups receive a delegated act first. For textiles, it has already been indicated that clothing containing eighty percent or more textile fibres will be the first to be addressed. For a company with ten to one hundred employees, this means mainly a matter of categorisation: which part of the assortment consists predominantly of textile fibres, and which part does not. A collection of basic T-shirts and trousers is more likely to fall under this than a line with many plastic, leather or metal components. If anyone is in doubt whether a category counts, they will find more detailed information on which products from the clothing and textile sector fall under the ESPR.
Keeping the distinction between "will apply" and "already applies" clear
A delegated act is not a standalone decision that comes out of nowhere; it is the implementation of powers that the ESPR itself already grants to the Commission. This makes the distinction between what will once apply and what already applies sometimes difficult to see in news reports and summaries. For a company, it is practical to keep this distinction sharp internally, precisely because commercial parties — suppliers, software companies, consultants — sometimes have an interest in suggesting urgency that does not yet exist. More background on how such an act works precisely and why it determines what a company must do is available on what a delegated act is and why it determines what I must do.
Following when the act for textiles is published
Once the delegated act for textiles has been adopted, it will contain the actual date on which the obligation takes effect, and the precise requirements for the passport. Until then, any date in circulation is an expectation based on the work plan, not an established fact. For a company, this means that following Commission publications is something that must be revisited at regular intervals, without a concrete action being attached to it yet. The distinction between the ESPR as a framework regulation and the broader European textile strategy in which this regulation is embedded is explained on the distinction between the ESPR and the European textile strategy.
Where things go wrong in practice
A supplier or software partner mentions a firm deadline that is based on nothing. Because the delegated act for textiles has not yet been published, no official date exists. If someone is presented with a definite year-based promise in a quotation or email ("mandatory from..."), it is wise to ask for the source of that date.
A company thinks that the passport applies only to clothing, not to the rest of the assortment. Brands that sell bags, belts or shoes in addition to clothing sometimes automatically assume that those products remain outside the scope. This is not necessarily the case; the classification of accessories and shoes follows its own route, explained on whether the product passport also applies to accessories and shoes.
Work clothing is forgotten in the planning. An importer that mainly supplies retail brands, but also carries a line of work clothing for business customers, often focuses attention on the retail collection and forgets that work clothing deserves its own assessment. See on this whether a product passport is also required for work clothing and uniforms.
Interior textiles are overlooked. Brands that offer curtains, bedding covers or other household textiles alongside clothing sometimes assume that only wearable clothing counts. That too is an assumption that does not necessarily hold; see whether the product passport also applies to household textiles such as curtains and sheets.
Small business, so automatically exempt. Some smaller importers and private label companies assume that an obligation coming from Brussels is mainly intended for large corporations. Whether the size of a business matters for what is expected is not automatically established and deserves its own assessment, to be found on whether the product passport also applies to small businesses.
What you can record
- An overview of your own assortment, divided by product group (clothing with predominantly textile fibres, accessories, shoes, workwear, interior textiles), so that when the delegated act is published, it is quickly clear which part of the collection comes into focus first.
- A list of suppliers and manufacturers per product group, with contact details, so that the data needed for a passport later does not have to be collected from scratch.
- A brief note on the source of each deadline mentioned internally or by suppliers — reference to the official publication by the Commission rather than to a news item or marketing text.
- A recurring agenda item (for example every quarter) to check whether the delegated act for textiles has been published.
- Documentation of the current composition of products (fibre types, origin, production process), which is already relevant for other regulations and can later be reused when compiling a passport. An initial orientation on what such a passport entails is available on what a digital product passport for clothing and textiles is exactly.
This is not legal advice. This page provides general information about the regulations that this platform covers. We are not familiar with your situation. If you are in doubt about your own case, consult a lawyer or the competent supervisory authority.
Written with AI based on the sources above, checked by a human on 2026-08-22. Is something wrong? Let us know — corrections are given priority.